This comment is laughable. Latest archeological and anthropological evidence (some included in this recent study https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0287101) shows that in majority of hunter gatherer communities both women and men hunted, including for big game typically associated with male hunters. The claim that men are 'hardwired' to be dominant is largely based on an old study of testosterone in... rats, not humans, and multiple studies have shown since that there's little to no connection between the two (Cordelia Fine's excellent 'Testosterone Rex' book includes quite a few of them).

But sure, it's definitely my 'anger' that 'distorted my perception of reality' and not, I don't know, a body of research and data which I studied over the last decade. Let me just read an old book, and all those silly ideas of mine will magically dissapear.